Vitanuova for 2002 April
<M <Y
Y> M>

From the Anarchist Book Fair to a Federal courtroom in two days -- what a contrast! I went down to San Jose on Monday morning to see a pre-trial hearing in United States v. Elcomsoft.

It was my first time in Federal court. (I've been in a state court before.) One lawyer said: "If you're ever bored, go down to the nearest Federal court and sit in the gallery. There's always something going on."

So, actually, there's a sort of a chain connecting these days one to another:

Saturday: I buy three books at a book fair. Sunday: I buy three books at a flea market, including Der Prozeß Monday: I see a criminal trial.

Aside from the Elcomsoft argument, there was a guilty plea in an immigration case. I'd like to write more about that at some point.

I haven't written here in a few days, so let me give a quick summary.

On Sunday, I saw Sumana and Leonard, and in the evening had my traditional Western Easter Dinner with Nick (walking from Sumana's place over to the Elmwood/Rockridge neighborhood), and Nick filled me in on some BBC stuff. Sumana and Leonard and I also went to the Ashby Flea Market, where I got Kafka's Der Prozeß in German, Gibson's All Tomorrow's Parties, and a book by Stanislaw Lem.

Peter Christopher came to town and stayed with me.

We went to SVLUG with Marc and Biella to hear Larry Wall speak about Perl 6.

A high school student got CSS decryption code published in his yearbook, but I'm not allowed to tell you where to find a picture of it.

I had an acupuncture appointment, something I haven't done since August.

An article about the Alien Tort Claims Act and a list of cases, mainly international human rights cases, brought under it.

There seems to be a growing consensus that patents are necessary to the development of new drugs. Is this consensus like the consensus that objects fall when dropped, or like the consensus that Coca-Cola is the Real Thing?

This is real:

Today's AWAD is sponsored by NannyTax, Inc., offering on-line tax preparation and payroll tax compliance services to employers of domestic help. Please visit http://www.nannytax.com

I finished God and Golem, Inc., by Norbert Wiener, the sixth book on my reading list.

That acupuncture appointment seemed to do me some good -- my arms are feeling the best they've been in about two weeks. They're still a little sore, but I think there's some improvement which is particular easy to notice. I'm going back on Thursday, and I have to try to find some insurance papers, because treatment over there might be covered by insurance.

Our Consensus At Lawyerpoint BPDG web log has been a big hit, with regular articles; there is RSS for syndication if you want Consensus At Lawyerpoint to appear on your own web diary or wherever you tend to collect RSS. Of course, we need all the publicity help we can get.

We're trying to get ahold of Valenti's 1982 testimony (the "Boston strangler" bit) and publish it on the web. Amazingly, it's nowhere to be found, unless you happen to have the Congressional Record around. Our law library is not quite there yet.

I had lunch with Danny O'Brien on Wednesday and talked about the prospect of a "computer literacy" in which most everyone is taught to program a computer (as most everyone is taught to read and write, and to do arithmetic and algebra). I talked a lot about how I came to be a programmer, and what programming meant to me, and how I thought other people thought about programming, and what might be some of the political implications resulting from the relatively obscure place of programming in our culture. Also, what would be different if programming ability were widespread. Also, what kinds of "digital divides" exist, and why the percentage of students who have an opportunity to use computers in schools may be a red herring.

I'm getting increasingly sympathetic to Cliff Stoll's ideas about computers in education. Or maybe I'm not particularly sympathetic to them, if I can wish that every student might be taught to program. Maybe I'm just unhappy with the status quo and with the fixed-function device and the compromises which have made a computer into a fixed-function device in so many lives and so many classrooms.

(A thought now races through my mind of a January morning and a sermon I seem to have preached. She was wearing blue jeans, if I remember anything at such a distance, and I know I had on slacks with funny pockets, that some people might keep tools inside of. In the morning, putting off what I really had to say, postponing it, fearing it, I preached about tinkering, technology, community, generality, the long-lost ideals of scientists and hobbyists, about what we had to lose if we lost generality. I preached about the end-to-end model and, as Alan Perlis said, "the ability to see the machine as more than when you were first led up to it, that you can make it more". I preached about what the advance of technology meant to me as a person and where it touched me and who wanted to threaten it, and the wickedness, the spiritual deadness which was prepared to stand up against that light, to obstruct it... O techne, o techne! And that was self-expression, so that she might see me properly for a moment.)

Later on, Peter talked to me about explicit and implicit curricula. The explicit curriculum is what's being taught -- what subjects -- and the implicit curriculum is how, and what associated skills and attitudes and behaviors are being taught along with it, and through it. It seems to be a kind of meta-curriculum. This is an interesting idea. To compare one implicit curriculum with another, I guess you'd need (SICP joke coming up!) a metacurricular evaluator.

All this reminds me that Doctor Dobbs Journal has printed my letter to the editor in the most current print edition. Good news! Now I must be a real programmer, or something.

My letter contemplates the impossibility of doing DRM in software on a general-purpose computer. This is such a frequent topic that maybe it should be a button: "Ask Me About the Impossibility of Digital Rights Management in Software on a General-Purpose Computer!"

Wired still hasn't printed my DRM-related letter to the editors. Maybe they were scared off by the shrink-wrap contract on the envelope it was mailed in.

Freudian slip this morning: typing "Serial Copy Mandate System" instead of "Serial Copy Management System".

Something I think Freudian slips should be called Markovian slips.

I watched Sex, Lies, and Videotape with Zack. The most astonishing line in that movie:

This isn't supposed to happen. I've spent nine years structuring my life so this didn't happen.

Written out, this looks almost comical. It looks like the speaker is being made to look ridiculous on account of some minor, overblown, failed obsession.

Spoken in the movie, it's not comical, it's anguished.

So go volunteer if you're a kernel and Python hacker.

Here we go again.

Michelle introduced me to a great PlayStation game called Dance Dance Revolution. It uses a floor pad-style controller (somewhat reminiscent of the old Nintendo mat controller which had -- I think -- sixteen numbered buttons). The PlayStation floor pad controller has all of the same buttons as a standard PlayStation controller, but you stand on it and press them with your feet.

In the game, the PlayStation will play dance music and flash arrows corresponding to dance steps. You have to step on the appropriate controller button at exactly the right moment. I played for a long time and got lots of exercise.

I think I'm forming a plan to make a new collage -- for Sarah. My old collage took months to complete, so if I do a new collage, it could take a similar amount of time.

We went onto Pacific Daylight Time out here, and I haven't quite adjusted yet.

  1. D2-D4 G8-F6
  2. C2-C4 E7-E6

 ABCDEFGH
 --------
|RNBQKB R|8
|PPPP PPP|7
|    PN  |6
|        |5
|  pp    |4
|        |3
|pp  pppp|2
|rnbqkbnr|1
 --------

Cory gave me a few cans of OpenCola (the soda) earlier this week. It's not available in any store!

There's more than one "digital divide", and it's not just about having access to a computer.

I've sent my second unusual EFF letter; the first was to Wired and the second is to the Random House Permissions Department.

I write to request permission to use 544 bytes from the Adobe eBook Edition of The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World by Lawrence Lessig. These bytes begin at byte position 160,737 within the eBook and are (in hexadecimal notation) ...

Speaking of letters and copyrights, here's Thomas Jefferson's famous letter (how many people have read the whole thing?) which compares ideas to fire. It's more interesting than my letter to Random House, which compares ideas to random numbers.

BPDG blog work continues apace.

  1. D2-D4 G8-F6
  2. C2-C4 E7-E6
  3. G1-F3 

 ABCDEFGH
 --------
|RNBQKB R|8
|PPPP PPP|7
|    PN  |6
|        |5
|  pp    |4
|     n  |3
|pp  pppp|2
|rnbqkb r|1
 --------

The new EFF Pioneer Award winners have been announced, and they are Dan Gillmor, Beth Givens, and the authors of DeCSS.

I saw Aubrey this week; she was visiting from Southern California on her spring break. We met at City Lights, and I bought a couple of books there. My Jane Jacobs book turned up at home, but, most interestingly, I picked up Double Fold: Libraries and the Assault on Paper by Nicholson Baker, which I've been reading over the past few days.

I seem to have several friends in Southern California now, which is nice, because I'm probably going to be going there pretty regularly to fight against a few of the troubles with the movies. (For instance, I'll be there on Tuesday and Wednesday, missing a bit of CFP.)

On Thursday of this week, I went to Rachel and Jeremy's place for another installment in their philosophy lecture series. This included a lecture on whether virtue can be taught (a question presented by Plato's Republic). In the ensuing discussion, I tried to distinguish several contrasting aspects of the question:

These questions reach out further into how we think about the world, and how we think about a human being.

I saw Ben on Saturday, and we walked up Bernal Hill and around the Mission.

Klaus Knopper released a new version of cloop (0.64).

Google decided to publish DMCA takedown notices it receives! They're being published at Chilling Effects, and Google's added a new feature so that, if your search results were affected by a takedown, you'll be notified and given the option to view the particular takedown letter which resulted in the alteration of your results! For example, a search for site:xenu.net scientology will show, at the bottom of affected pages, a legend showing what Google has done, and letting you find out more about who was responsible. See Don Marti's article "Google Begins Making DMCA Takedowns Public" and Google's DMCA policy. "It is our policy to send copies of all notices of alleged infringement to third parties who will make them available to the public." Wow!

Google's API was also announced and published; you can use SOAP to create your own Google applications (Googlewhacking, SROMs, reverse links, statistical analysis, much else).

Here's a suggestion that publishing virus code is wrong; I've already disagreed with that piece, long before it was written, and I can't even imagine that anybody who knows me would think that I agree. Maybe it's sufficient merely to link to it and let people draw their own conclusions about the article and what I think about it.

Large File Support is cool!

My acupuncture treatment seems to be working pretty well.

Carlos Laviola points out that there is an Internet host called 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097.org. That's slightly more digits of pi than I know.

I tried again. What about the centralized storage of health information, as Oracle was proposing to do with the Leaders system. Would Ellison want government officials to have access to personally identifiable genetic information?

"I feel like Alice has fallen through the looking glass," Ellison said. His voice rose; he was starting to get a little testy. "Does this other database bother you here? We can't touch that database because I won't be able to use my credit card. Like, I won't be able to go to the mall!" He took on the voice of Sean Penn's stoner from "Fast Times at Ridgemont High." "Like, that's really disturbing. Like, don't mess with my mall experience. O.K., so people have to die over here without this, but that's not going to affect my experience going to the mall." He exhaled, and in his regular billionaire voice asked, "I mean, what the hell is going on?"

(Jeffrey Rosen, "Silicon Valley's Spy Game")

I watched The Truman Show with Zack on Saturday, and after that I was tempted to find my poem "Of Non-Existing Country", which I wrote in November, and I tell you that it has so many points in common with The Truman Show, or so many points inspiring reflection, and that it is one of the saddest things I have ever written.

I wrote that poem when I saw its epigraph on Brian Gaeke's home page:

Once upon a time I was a member of the University of Cincinnati Linux Users' Group, but that group seems to have disappeared. It's kind of like Andrei [Moutchkine]'s "I am a citizen of non-existing country", only somehow less ...urgent?

The poem itself has no connection with either Andrei or Brian, or with any actual non-existing country (does that make sense)? It is an elaboration of that line, "I am a citizen of non-existing country", for myself, and brings in the Aeneid, Jewish and Christian scriptures, the Odyssey, John Donne, the Iliad, the Somnium Scipionis, and at least six other sources I've forgotten, and likely didn't identify as I was writing it.

One interesting thing is that it's almost all about mental states, emotions, and beliefs: the poem takes place almost entirely in what some people would call interior monologue. There isn't any action in the physical world -- except an action at the end which is doubly removed from reality by being not only metaphorical but also hypothetical. That is, I hypothesize about performing a metaphorical act.

I wore a temporary blue ribbon tattoo. We've had a number of them around the office, and I decided to put one on and see how long it would last.

Zack is having a nice time with XSLT for Kernel Traffic.

Zack and I filled out tax forms together. I have a net refund, but it's likely to be delayed because I realized I never sent in the paperwork after getting an extension last year. (I sent in the money, but not the "supporting documentation".) My taxes from last year are thus technically late, and I wouldn't be surprised if the State of California decided to hold off on sending me a refund for this year.

  1. D2-D4 G8-F6
  2. C2-C4 E7-E6
  3. G1-F3 B7-B6

 ABCDEFGH
 --------
|RNBQKB R|8
|P PP PPP|7
| P  PN  |6
|        |5
|  pp    |4
|     n  |3
|pp  pppp|2
|rnbqkb r|1
 --------

Briefly noted: Tim O'Reilly on used books; Scientific American on the decline of tinkering; Cory on related issues; security through obscurity considered harmful (Internet Draft); and, of course, the U.S. patent for a "Method of Swinging on a Swing" (via Lisa Rein):

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method of swinging on a swing.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A few basic types of swings have been around for generations. Perhaps the most common is one that includes a seat suspended between two ropes or chains that are hung from a tree branch or other substantially horizontal support. These swings are often found in side-by-side sets of two or three or more on, for example, a school playground.

Young children often need help to climb onto a swing, and may need a push (sometimes even an "underdog" push) to begin swinging. Others may be able to begin the swinging movement on their own by pushing with their feet against the ground, and once moving may coordinate the motion of their legs and body in what may be called "pumping" to sustain the movement of the swing. When swinging in this manner, the user travels along a path as generally shown in the cross-section of FIG. 1. Another method of swinging on a swing involves twisting the seat around repeatedly so that the chains or ropes are wound in a double helix. When allowed to unwind, the swing spins quickly, which can be entertaining for the user.

What a contrast between the Copy Protection Technical Working Group in the morning and the EFF Pioneer Awards that same evening! John Hoy was there in L.A. in the morning and Jon Johansen there in S.F. that night. (Jon appeared via MPEG-2 because he was afraid of being arrested or sued if he came to the U.S. I have it on good authority that the MPEG-2 file was not encrypted with CSS.)

The Pioneer Awards were given to Dan Gillmor, Beth Givens, and Jon Johansen and the other authors of DeCSS. A terribly distinguished and interesting crowd turned out for the ceremony and the great dessert which accompanied it. I knew dozens of people there and had never met most of them face-to-face.

I'll have to write more soon.

I was tempted to say "We haven't had that spirit here since 1999". I can actually think of two other times we've had that spirit here: the first-ever LinuxWorld conference, in 1998, and the RSA Patent Expiration Party, in 2000.

  1. D2-D4 G8-F6
  2. C2-C4 E7-E6
  3. G1-F3 B7-B6
  4. B1-C3 ...

 ABCDEFGH
 --------
|RNBQKB R|8
|P PP PPP|7
| P  PN  |6
|        |5
|  pp    |4
|  n  n  |3
|pp  pppp|2
|r bqkb r|1
 --------

Itinerant EFF reps, ricocheting from LA's Copy Protection Technology Working Group, struggling with the culture-shock: blank-faced Hollywood apparatchiks plotting the downfall of open computing there, geeks open-mouthed with horror here.

(Need To Know, April 19, 2002, on the sights and sounds of Computers, Freedom, and Privacy)

How come I move to California and end up moving away from the earthquakes shaking Massachusetts? If I'd stayed home, I would have experienced more and bigger earthquakes than I have out here.

Bill Gates on the GPL vs. "the capitalistic approach":

And I think you will see some countries who really believe in the capitalistic approach; that is, that software should generate jobs, and government R&D should generate jobs, so that government R&D should be done on a basis that it can be commercialized. There's a faction against that, the so-called general GPL source license free software foundation, that says that these other countries other than the U.S. should devote R&D dollars in the so-called open approach, that means you can never commercialize that software. And it is an interesting choice to deny -- for a country to deny itself the benefits of these high-paying jobs and the kind of taxes that let countries fund their universities, and fund general research that then goes to renew that pool of commercial R&D. Clearly there's an ecosystem there that has worked extremely well in the United States, and has probably been the unique thing that has let that push forward. And there is now a recognition that it's really a question of policy of allowing the so-called capitalistic approach to win the day there.

I had a very busy weekend, including a visit with Katy, a trip back to the swimming pool, and another trip to Berkeley to visit Michelle and Karen Coyle, a librarian of some distinction who gave me interesting advice on copyright and preservation issues. She also let me borrow a documentary called Into the Future, on the subject of digital preservation.

I finished Double Fold just before the weekend -- speaking of preservation issues -- and Lessig's The Future of Ideas on Sunday, just before Biella's reading group meeting. The reading group was a lot of fun, and featured a diverse, talented, and interesting bunch of readers, all friends of Biella's. They included journalists, programmers, lawyers, and some who fit into more than one of those categories. I finally met Annalee Newitz, whom I suggested a year ago was like the Cumaean Sybil, but she didn't seem very Sybiline (Sybilish?) in person. Color unus, comptae mansere comae, shall we say?

Anyway, I still haven't gotten around to writing up much about CFP, but I don't know just what to say about it, other than listing people I finally met face to face, and other than praising the encouraging spirit which prevailed throughout the conference. (Some reports described the mood as "subdued"; if that was "subdued", I wish I'd seen earlier CFPs!)

Just two of the many heroes and heroines I encountered this past week were the human rights statistician Patrick Ball and the copyright law professor Jessica Litman. And here I don't mean to slight any of the other remarkable people I encountered at the conference, but if I were to try to list everyone I'd been excited to meet, I'd be here long past when I ought to go to sleep.

  1. D2-D4 G8-F6
  2. C2-C4 E7-E6
  3. G1-F3 B7-B6
  4. B1-C3 F8-B4

 ABCDEFGH
 --------
|RNBQK  R|8
|P PP PPP|7
| P  PN  |6
|        |5
| Bpp    |4
|  n  n  |3
|pp  pppp|2
|r bqkb r|1
 --------

Poor Jack Valenti, caught in a film loop with a 20-year cycle! Here in testimony to the House Judiciary Committee, he repeats the claims, rhetoric, arguments, and even analogies ("avalanche!") he made in 1982 before the House Judiciary Committee. Of course, then it was about the VCR avalanche; this time through the loop, it's the digital avalanche.

My arms are sore again. I'm behind on exercise and acupuncture, which may have something to do with this.

I'm off to the Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop tomorrow (to speak on "The DRM Dark Age: Copy Controls and Cultural Continuity"). I'll be back Friday, and maybe my arms will feel better by then.

  1. D2-D4 G8-F6
  2. C2-C4 E7-E6
  3. G1-F3 B7-B6
  4. B1-C3 F8-B4
  5. C1-D2 ...

 ABCDEFGH
 --------
|RNBQK  R|8
|P PP PPP|7
| P  PN  |6
|        |5
| Bpp    |4
|  n  n  |3
|pp bpppp|2
|r  qkb r|1
 --------

So, I just got back from the Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop, at the Asilomar Conference Center, just south of Monterey, on the Pacific coast.

I had a nice time, and gave a presentation on "The DRM Dark Age: Copy Controls and Cultural Continuity" (as well as speaking on BPDG and the LNX-BBC).

The workshop had a variety of extraordinarily geeky people and talks (sample lunch conversation: is the universe actually a computer simulation, as Wolfram and Fredkin seem to suggest?). I was given a genuine fragment of a (failed) communications satellite, not to mention some punched paper tape (by the hobbyist who'd programmed the tape with programs for controlling his serial-port-based LAN full of refurbished classic communications equipment -- such as a genuine teletype!). I heard about the adult entertainment industry, the end-to-end model, software-defined radio, how touchpads work (with a wild story about free-space capacitance), what risks beset satellites in geosynchronous orbit, the open spectrum movement, how academics might be able to break the journal publishers' hold on their research, and all sorts of anecdotes out of various eras in computing history.

I saw some really neat mechanical stuff, and also the movie Brazil, which I'd never seen before and which has got to me the most distressing movie I've ever seen. It's especially eerie if you watch it all alone after midnight in an empty hall in a house by yourself on a huge projection screen with gigantic speakers -- and then the janitors begin to enter the building and unlock the doors one by one as they work their way toward the room where you are watching the movie...

Brazil is the first movie I've seen in ages which doesn't have a happy ending. I find it surprising to see movies with even vaguely ambiguous endings, let alone endings full of pain and despair. I'm thoroughly accustomed to the Hollywood conventions in which everything is required to work out, the hero protagonist to survive and triumph, evil to be punished, and in general the old Comics Code requirements to be followed in broad outline.

And Brazil kept on having moments where it could have ended, credits could have rolled, and the happy-ending or optimistic-ending conventions could have been fulfilled. (In fact, in one scene, I was completely convinced that the movie had ended, as the camera panned upward and the scene began to fade from our view -- the triumph and union of the hero and heroine seemed complete, and maybe even secure. And here the movie suddenly began in earnest.)

It's strange that I should expect the movie format in particular to work this way. Other formats don't work this way; plays are certainly allowed to end on thoroughly sad notes:

A glooming peace this morning with it brings;
The sun, for sorrow, will not show his head.
Go hence to have more talk of these sad things;
Some shall be pardon'd, and some punishèd.

(And the tradition of plays with sad endings is centuries older yet.)

Maybe the cinematic form contributed to this, but I found Brazil harrowing and terrifying.

On our way back from Asilomar, we went through Monterey, and I got to see Cannery Row, dramatically different from what it must have been like when Steinbeck wrote about it.

Leonard says of me:

Boy, that Seth David Schoen. When he's not talking about the devious plans of The Man to reduce us all to digital chattel, he's complaining that his arms hurt. I tell ya, it's always arms and The Man with Seth.

This (past) week is Copyright Awareness Week, and this (coming) day is World Intellectual Property Day. WIPOUT's announced its essay contest winners, and WIPO seems poised to do the same.

But, more exciting to me, Random House granted me permission to use 544 bytes from the Adobe eBook edition of Lessig's The Future of Ideas in my forthcoming "DRM Dark Age" paper.

This is good news (and discussed briefly now at Consensus At Lawyerpoint).

I went out to HSC in Santa Clara with Nick and Don on Saturday, and had a nice time. I ate all I could at the all-you-can-eat restaurant called Sweet Tomatoes, and picked up a high-speed motor, some LCD displays, a key switch, and jumper wire.

On Sunday, I lost a large sum of money suddenly to what I think (and hope) was a bank error.

I'm off to L.A. for the day on Monday, and I'll be back in the evening.

I have a few extended comments which I meant to make here and then postponed or forgot about. One of them is the "Skepticism Is Not Fun" essay. I had another which has totally slipped my mind.

I spent all day, and I mean all day, in Los Angeles at the Broadcast Protection Discussion Group meeting. That was quite an experience, and there are many interesting quotations scribbled in my notebook. Maybe some of what I heard will appear on Consensus At Lawyerpoint.

I had spirited discussions with several entertainment lawyers -- in some cases about whether DeCSS should be legal. My "Free Mickey" and "Free Jon Johansen" button and sticker probably made some of my opinions evident.

I got back Monday evening and am at home now.

Thoughts in L.A.: socialization into a culture; laws and sausages; fundamental rights and "moral trumps"; contrasting political philosophies; defaults and baselines; the Treaty of Tordesillas; historical contingency; legislation as strategy versus legislation as moral statement; "if you won't support effective means to fight terrorism, you must support terrorism" (oops, I mean piracy).

Most wonderful moment in the meeting:

Group co-chair [at front of room]: Has everyone had a chance to review the new proposal?

MPAA attorney [sitting near me]: I got my copy off the EFF web site.

I immediately replied "We're always glad to be of assistance".

Lawyer: I was one of the lead attorneys in that action!

Seth: I've read a great deal of your writing.

Lawyer: Don't believe everything you read.

Seth: Don't worry, I didn't.

Later on that day:

Another entertainment lawyer: I don't understand why all of these academics are so anti-copyright. I mean, they sell textbooks. I don't think they would think it was fair use if somebody copied their textbooks on the Internet.

So, that huge bank charge was made by an actual creditor of mine, but I didn't authorize them to and they didn't seem to have any record of having made it. (That's kind of scary.) I managed to stop payment on the charge, and the creditor didn't seem to object, but now I'm worried that there's one office out there which thinks I should have paid and another office which thinks I didn't need to pay. Did you ever have the experience of calling a creditor and having several representatives disagree about the status of your account? That's what I'm afraid of.

So maybe in two months I'm going to get a call saying "You stopped payment on money you owed us! We're going to report you to a credit bureau!" or maybe someone will just do it without telling me and I'll have no idea.

At http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/~twm/embed/dmca.html:

The OS/2 chunk
has a bit for embedding.
Set it to zero.

I finished The Castle, by Franza Kafka, the seventh book on my reading list.

It didn't do much for me at this point, I'm afraid.

Vitanuova for 2002 April
<M <Y
Y> M>
[Main]
Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


Contact: Seth David Schoen